Kel-Tec Sub 2000 Gen 2 vs Gen 3: A Detailed Comparison
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000 is a popular choice for its unique folding design and versatility. But with the release of the Gen 3, many shooters are wondering what improvements have been made and whether the upgrade is worthwhile. This detailed comparison will delve into the key differences between the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 Gen 2 and Gen 3, helping you determine which generation best suits your needs.
What are the Key Differences Between Gen 2 and Gen 3?
The most significant differences between the Gen 2 and Gen 3 Sub 2000 lie in the ergonomics, features, and materials. While the core functionality remains largely the same—a lightweight, foldable pistol-caliber carbine—the enhancements in the Gen 3 address some common criticisms of its predecessor.
1. Improved Ergonomics: The Gen 3 boasts a redesigned pistol grip that offers a more comfortable and secure hold. This is a significant upgrade, as many users found the Gen 2 grip somewhat uncomfortable for extended shooting sessions. The improved grip angle and texturing provide better control and reduce hand fatigue.
2. Enhanced Charging Handle: The Gen 3 features a more robust and user-friendly charging handle. It's been redesigned for smoother operation and easier manipulation, even with gloves. The Gen 2 charging handle, while functional, was sometimes reported as being stiff or difficult to use.
3. Upgraded Materials: While both generations utilize polymer construction for lightweight portability, the Gen 3 features refined materials and manufacturing processes that result in a slightly more durable and refined feel. This doesn't necessarily mean the Gen 2 is flimsy, but the Gen 3 feels noticeably more robust.
4. Rail System Modifications: While the Gen 2 offers a Picatinny rail system, the Gen 3 often incorporates design tweaks for improved accessory mounting and stability. These minor adjustments contribute to better overall accessory integration.
5. Improved Trigger: Many users have noted a slightly improved trigger pull on the Gen 3, although this is subjective and experiences may vary. The reduction in perceived trigger creep, if any, is generally considered a positive upgrade.
Does the Gen 3 Sub 2000 Have a Better Folding Mechanism?
The folding mechanism itself hasn't undergone a drastic overhaul. Both generations utilize a simple and reliable folding system that allows the firearm to be compactly stored or carried. The main improvement here is the enhanced overall durability related to the upgraded materials and manufacturing processes in the Gen 3, leading to a more robust folding mechanism that should withstand more wear and tear.
What Magazines Work with Each Generation?
Generally, magazines compatible with the Gen 2 will also work with the Gen 3. However, it is always prudent to verify magazine compatibility before purchasing. Minor variations in magazine well design are possible between generations, although this is usually not a major issue.
Which Generation is Right for Me?
The choice between the Gen 2 and Gen 3 Sub 2000 often comes down to budget and the importance of the ergonomic and material enhancements. If you can afford it, the Gen 3 offers a refined shooting experience with improved ergonomics, a more robust feel, and minor but valuable feature upgrades. However, the Gen 2 remains a reliable and capable firearm, particularly if you can find one at a more affordable price. Consider your priorities and budget carefully before making your decision.
Is the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 Gen 3 Worth the Upgrade?
Whether the Gen 3 is "worth the upgrade" depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you already own a Gen 2 and are happy with its performance, the upgrades in the Gen 3 might not justify the cost. However, for new buyers, the Gen 3 offers a more refined and user-friendly experience. The improved ergonomics and durability make the additional cost worthwhile for many shooters.
